Side of LogoAETC National Resource Center HomeSide of LogoTop of BannerSpacerSpacer
AETC Only
Side of Banner
AETC Services and ContactsAETC Education and Training ResourcesSearchAETC National Resource Center Home
Spacer
Spacer
transparent gif
spacespaceClinical Manual > Complaints > Lymphadenopathy
space
 CONTENTS
1Testing/ Assessment
2Health Maintenance
3ARV Therapy
4ARV Complications
5Complaints
6Diseases
7Pain and Palliative
8Neuropsychiatric
9Populations
10Resources
  
space

Clinical Manual for Management of the HIV-Infected Adult
2006 Edition

Section 5: Complaint-Specific Workups

Lymphadenopathy

Chapter Contents
Background
Subjective
Objective
Assessment
Plan
Patient Education
References
space

Background

Lymphadenopathy is very common in HIV-infected individuals and may occur at any stage of HIV infection. It may be the first indication of a serious local or systemic condition, and should be evaluated carefully. Rapid enlargement of a previously stable lymph node or a group of nodes requires evaluation to identify the cause and to determine whether treatment is needed. Similarly, nodes that are abnormal in consistency, tender to palpation, fluctuant, asymmetrical, adherent to surrounding tissues, or accompanied by other symptoms should be evaluated promptly.

Lymphadenopathy may be generalized or localized and is usually characterized by lymph nodes that are >1 cm in diameter. A multitude of conditions can cause lymphadenopathy, including HIV itself, opportunistic or other infections, and malignancies. The likely causes of lymphadenopathy, and thus the diagnostic workup, will depend in part on the patient's degree of immunosuppression. The risk of opportunistic and certain malignant conditions increases at lower CD4 cell counts (see chapter CD4 Monitoring and Viral Load Testing).

Many individuals with primary HIV infection (see chapter Primary HIV Infection) may have generalized lymphadenopathy that may resolve or may persist for months to years. If lymphadenopathy of >2 cm in size occurs in 2 or more noncontiguous sites and persists for more than 3 months, and if appropriate evaluation reveals no other cause, the patient is diagnosed with persistent generalized lymphadenopathy (PGL). PGL is usually due to follicular hyperplasia from chronic HIV infection. As long as enlarged nodes are stable in number, location, and size, persons with PGL require no management other than monitoring of nodes at each physical examination. Changes in the character of the lymph nodes should prompt further evaluation. Rapid involution of PGL may occur with advanced HIV disease and is a poor prognostic sign.

S: Subjective

The patient complains of new, worsening, or persistent glandular swellings in the neck, axilla, groin, or elsewhere.

Ascertain the following during the history:

O: Objective

Review recent CD4 cell counts and HIV viral load measurements.

Check vital signs. Perform a complete examination of lymph nodes, including the cervical, submandibular, supraclavicular, axillary, epitrochlear, and inguinal sites. Document the location, size, consistency, mobility, and presence or absence of tenderness of all abnormal nodes. In cases of localized lymphadenopathy, examine the area drained by the node. Check for hepatosplenomegaly. Perform a focused examination (eg, lung, breast, skin, genitals) to identify signs of local or systemic illness.

A: Assessment

The differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in HIV-infected patients depends in part on the degree of immunosuppression. For further information, see chapter CD4 Monitoring and Viral Load Testing.

Infectious Causes

Generalized lymphadenopathy

Localized lymphadenopathy

Neoplastic Causes

Other Causes

P: Plan

Diagnostic Evaluation

After the history and physical examination, the cause of lymphadenopathy may be clear and further diagnostic testing may not be necessary. If the cause of the lymphadenopathy is still uncertain, perform diagnostic testing as indicated by the patient's presentation. This may include the following tests:

If a node is large, fixed, nontender, or otherwise worrisome, or if the diagnosis is unclear after initial evaluation, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy may provide a diagnosis. If FNA is nondiagnostic (false-negative results are relatively common), obtain an open biopsy for definitive evaluation. Biopsy specimens should be sent for bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal cultures; acid-fast staining for mycobacteria; and cytologic examination.

If a node is large, inflamed, tender, or fluctuant, and a bacterial infection is suspected, consider initiating empiric antibiotic treatment and monitoring the patient over 1-2 weeks. If the node does not respond to antibiotic treatment or the patient becomes more symptomatic, arrange for FNA or open biopsy to establish the diagnosis.

Treatment

Treatment will depend on the cause of lymphadenopathy. Refer to the guidelines in Section 6: Disease-Specific Treatment or primary care management guidelines as appropriate. In the case of HIV-related lymphadenopathy, antiretroviral therapy may be effective.

Patient Education

References

space
space
  space

Copyright 2006, the AIDS Education & Training Centers National Resource Center, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Email webmaster@aidsetc.org with questions, comments, or problems. See disclaimer for usage guidelines.