home





























 


















 






















hrsa

participating institutions:
Johns Hopkins University AIDS Service, New York State DOH AIDS Institute, The CORE Center, Cook County Hospital



ART & PREGNANCY

last updated: May 4, 2001


COMPLETE GUIDELINES:


html pdf selected tables panel members


RELATED INFORMATION:


faqsnewslinks


Antiretroviral Clinical Scenarios

Scenario #1: HIV-Infected Pregnant Women Who Have Not Received Prior Antiretroviral Therapy

Recommendation
Pregnant women with HIV infection must receive standard clinical, immunologic, and virologic evaluation. Recommendations for initiation and choice of antiretroviral therapy should be based on the same parameters used for persons who are not pregnant, although the known and unknown risks and benefits of such therapy during pregnancy must be considered and discussed (14). The three-part ZDV chemoprophylaxis regimen, initiated after the first trimester, should be recommended for all pregnant women with HIV infection regardless of antenatal HIV RNA copy number to reduce the risk for perinatal transmission. The combination of ZDV chemoprophylaxis with additional antiretroviral drugs for treatment of HIV infection is recommended for infected women whose clinical, immunologic or virologic status requires treatment or who have HIV RNA over 1,000 copies/mL regardless of clinical or immunologic status. Women who are in the first trimester of pregnancy may consider delaying initiation of therapy until after 10-12 weeks' gestation.

Discussion

When ZDV is administered in the three-part PACTG 07 regimen, perinatal transmission is reduced by approximately 70%. The mechanism by which ZDV reduces transmission is not known. However, protection is likely multifactorial. Pre-exposure prophylaxis of the infant is provided by passage of ZDV across the placenta. Thus, inhibitory levels of the drug are present in the fetus during the birth process. While placental passage of ZDV is excellent, other antiretroviral drugs have variable transplacental passage (Table 2). Therefore, when combination antiretroviral therapy is initiated during pregnancy, ZDV should be included as a component of antenatal therapy whenever possible. Since the mechanism by which ZDV reduces transmission is not known, the intrapartum and newborn ZDV parts of the chemoprophylactic regimen should be administered to reduce perinatal HIV transmission. If a woman does not receive ZDV as a component of her antenatal antiretroviral regimen, intrapartum and newborn ZDV should continue to be recommended.

Women should be counseled that potent combination antiretroviral regimens have substantial benefit for their own health and may provide enhanced protection against perinatal transmission. Several studies have indicated that women with low or undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels (e.g. <1,000 copies/mL) have extremely low rates of perinatal transmission, particularly when antiretroviral therapy has been received (70, 71, 81). However, there is no threshold below which lack of transmission can be assured, and the long-term effects of in utero exposure to multiple antiretroviral drugs is unknown. Decisions regarding the use and choice of an antiretroviral regimen should be individualized based on discussion with the woman about a) her risk for disease progression and the risks and benefits of delaying initiation of therapy; b) possible benefit of lowering viral load for reducing perinatal transmission; c) potential drug toxicities and interactions with other drugs; d) the need for strict adherence to the prescribed drug schedule to avoid the development of drug resistance; e) unknown long-term effects of in utero drug exposure on the infant; and f) pre-clinical, animal, and clinical data relevant to use of the currently available antiretrovirals during pregnancy. Due to the evolving and complex nature of the management of HIV-1 infection, a specialist with experience in the treatment of pregnant women with HIV infection should be involved in their care.

Because the period of organogenesis (when the fetus is most susceptible to potential teratogenic effects of drugs) is during the first 10 weeks of gestation and the risks of antiretroviral therapy during that period are unknown, women who are in the first trimester of pregnancy may wish to consider delaying initiation of therapy until after 10-12 weeks' gestation. This decision should be carefully considered and discussed between the health-care provider and the patient; such a discussion should include an assessment of the woman's health status and the benefits and risks of delaying initiation of therapy for several weeks, and the knowledge that most perinatal HIV-1 transmission likely occurs late in pregnancy or during delivery. Treatment with efavirenz should be avoided during the first trimester because significant teratogenic effects in rhesus macaques were seen at drug exposures similar to those representing human exposure. Hydroxyurea is a potent teratogen in a variety of animal species and should also be avoided during the first trimester (Table 2 and see **SAFETY AND TOXICITY OF INDIVIDUAL ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS IN PREGNANCY **).

When initiation of antiretroviral therapy would be considered optional based on current guidelines for treatment of non-pregnant individuals (14), infected pregnant women should be counseled regarding the potential benefits of standard combination therapy and should be offered such therapy, including the three-part ZDV chemoprophylaxis regimen. Although such women are at low risk for clinical disease progression if combination therapy is delayed, antiretroviral therapy that successfully reduces HIV-1 RNA to levels below 1,000 copies/mL may substantially lower the risk of perinatal HIV-1 transmission and limit consideration of elective cesarean delivery as an intervention to reduce transmission risk.

When combination therapy is administered, the regimen should be chosen from those recommended for non-pregnant adults (14). Dual nucleoside analogue therapy without the addition of either a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor is not recommended due to the potential for inadequate viral suppression and rapid development of resistance (99). If combination therapy is given principally to reduce perinatal transmission and would have been optional for treatment of non-pregnant individuals, consideration may be given to discontinuing therapy postnatally, with the decision to reinitiate treatment based on standard criteria for non-pregnant individuals. If drugs are discontinued postnatally, all drugs should be stopped simultaneously. Discussion regarding the decision to continue or stop combination therapy postpartum should occur prior to initiation of therapy during pregnancy.


Use of antiretroviral prophylaxis has been shown to provide benefit in preventing perinatal transmission even for infected pregnant women with HIV-1 RNA levels < 1,000 copies/mL. In a meta-analysis of factors associated with perinatal transmission among women who had infected infants despite having HIV-1 RNA <1,000 copies/mL at or near delivery, transmission was only 1.0% among women receiving antenatal antiretroviral therapy (primarily ZDV alone) compared to 9.8% among those receiving no antenatal therapy (100). Therefore, use of antiretroviral prophylaxis is recommended for all pregnant women with HIV infection regardless of antenatal HIV RNA level.

The time-limited use of ZDV alone during pregnancy for chemoprophylaxis of perinatal transmission is controversial. The potential benefits of standard combination antiretroviral regimens for treatment of HIV infection should be discussed with and offered to all pregnant women with HIV infection regardless of viral load, and is recommended for all pregnant women with HIV-1 RNA levels >1,000 copies/mL. However, some women may wish to restrict exposure of their fetus to antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy but still wish to reduce the risk of transmitting HIV to their infant. Additionally, for women with HIV-1 RNA levels <1,000 copies/mL, time-limited use of ZDV during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy is less likely to induce the development of resistance due to the limited viral replication existing in the patient and the time-limited exposure to the antiretroviral drug. For example, the development of ZDV resistance was unusual among the healthy population of women who participated in PACTG 076 (52). The use of ZDV chemoprophylaxis alone during pregnancy might be an appropriate option for these women.

See Table 3: Clinical Scenarios and Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Reduce Periantal Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission

Scenario #2: HIV-Infected Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy During the Current Pregnancy

Recommendation
HIV-1 infected women receiving antiretroviral therapy in whom pregnancy is identified after the first trimester should continue therapy. ZDV should be a component of the antenatal antiretroviral treatment regimen after the first trimester whenever possible, although this may not always be feasible. For women receiving such therapy in whom pregnancy is recognized during the first trimester, the woman should be counseled regarding the benefits and potential risks of antiretroviral administration during this period, and continuation of therapy should be considered. If therapy is discontinued during the first trimester, all drugs should be stopped and reintroduced simultaneously to avoid the development of drug resistance. Regardless of the antepartum antiretroviral regimen, ZDV administration is recommended during the intrapartum period and for the newborn. Recommendations for resistance testing in HIV-infected pregnant women are the same as for non-pregnant patients: acute HIV infection and virologic failure or suboptimal viral suppression after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

Discussion
Women who have been receiving antiretroviral treatment for their HIV infection should continue treatment during pregnancy. Discontinuation of therapy could lead to an increase in viral load, which could result in decline in immune status and disease progression and result in adverse consequences for both the fetus and the woman.

ZDV should be a component of the antenatal antiretroviral treatment whenever possible. However, there may be circumstances where this is not feasible, such as the occurrence of significant ZDV-related toxicity. Additionally, women receiving an antiretroviral regimen that does not contain ZDV but who have HIV-1 RNA levels that are consistently very low or undetectable (e.g., <1,000 copies/mL) have a very low risk of perinatal transmission (81), and there may be concerns that the addition of ZDV to the current regimen could compromise adherence to treatment.

The maternal antenatal antiretroviral treatment regimen should be continued on schedule as much as possible during labor to provide maximal virologic effect and to minimize the chance of development of drug resistance. If a woman has not received ZDV as a component of her antenatal therapeutic antiretroviral regimen, intravenous ZDV should still be administered to the pregnant woman during the intrapartum period whenever feasible. Because ZDV and d4T should not be administered together due to potential pharmacologic antagonsim, options for women receiving oral d4T as part of their antenatal therapy include continuation of oral d4T during labor without intravenous ZDV, or withholding oral d4T during the period of intravenous ZDV administration during labor. Additionally, the infant should receive the standard 6 week course of ZDV.

For women with suboptimal suppression of HIV-1 RNA (e.g., above 1,000 copies/mL) near the time of delivery despite prenatal receipt of ZDV prophylaxis and/or combination antiretroviral therapy, there are currently no data to demonstrate that administration of additional antiretroviral drugs during labor and delivery provides added protection against perinatal transmission. In the HIVNET 012 study in Ugandan women without antenatal antiretroviral therapy, a two-dose nevirapine regimen (single dose to the woman at the onset of labor and single dose to the infant at age 48 hours) significantly reduced perinatal transmission compared to a ultra-short intrapartum/1 week postpartum ZDV regimen (61). In women in the United States, Europe, Brazil and the Bahamas who are receiving antenatal antiretroviral therapy, PACTG 316 is evaluating the addition of the same two-dose intrapartum/postpartum nevirapine regimen to standard therapy compared to the addition of a nevirapine placebo. Final results of PACTG 316 are anticipated in early 2001, but due to an unexpectedly low overall transmission rate, the study will have limited power to address whether nevirapine provides any additional benefit for reducing transmission in women who have received antenatal therapy.

Selection of nevirapine-resistant virus was found at 6 weeks postpartum in pregnant women receiving a single dose of nevirapine during labor. In HIVNET 012, where drugs other than nevirapine were not given, 7 of 31 women (23%) evaluated.developed genotypic resistance mutations at 6 weeks postpartum; these mutations were no longer present in 4 women studied at 13-18 months postpartum (105, 106). In the antiretroviral-treated women in PACTG 316, 4 of 32 women (13%, 95% CI 4-25%) with HIV-1 RNA above 3,000 copies/mL at delivery who received nevirapine developed genotypic nevirapine resistance mutations compared to none of 38 women in the placebo arm (107).

The duration that nevirapine-resistant mutations persist following the removal of the selective pressure induced by the single dose of nevirapine in women with and without antenatal antiretroviral treatment remains unclear. The clinical implications of these findings for future maternal treatment options, especially among women with access to standard combination antiretroviral therapies, remain unknown at present. If the addition of the two-dose nevirapine regimen to existing antiretroviral therapy is considered for a woman currently receiving treatment, the potential implications for future maternal therapy and the unproven benefit in further reducing transmission need to be weighed very carefully and discussed with the woman. Guidelines on decisions related to obstetric interventions to reduce perinatal transmission in antiretroviral-treated women with suboptimal virologic suppression near the time of delivery are outlined in the "Perinatal HIV-1 Transmission and Mode of Delivery" section of this document.

The impact of prior antiretroviral exposure on the efficacy of ZDV chemoprophylaxis is unclear. Data from PACTG 185 indicate that duration of prior ZDV therapy in women with advanced HIV-1 disease, many of whom received prolonged ZDV before pregnancy, was not associated with diminished ZDV efficacy for reduction of transmission (57). Perinatal transmission rates were similar for women who first initiated ZDV during pregnancy and women who had received ZDV prior to pregnancy. Thus, a history of ZDV therapy before the current pregnancy should not limit recommendations for administration of ZDV chemoprophylaxis to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission.

Some clinicians have recommended antiretroviral drug resistance testing for all pregnant women, although this is controversial (108). Although perinatal transmission of ZDV-resistant virus has been reported, it is unclear if the presence of genotypic drug resistance mutations increase the risk of transmission, and the utility of resistance testing in pregnant women receiving antitretroviral treatment who have successful virologic control is minimal. In PACTG 076, the prevalence and incidence of ZDV resistance was low (3%) and the presence of resistance did not correlate with transmission (52). However, in a cohort of women with more advanced disease who were receiving antenatal monotherapy with ZDV between 1989-1994 (prior to the results of.January 24, 2001 PACTG 076), the prevalence of ZDV resistance was 24%; in multivariate analysis, the presence of ZDV drug resistance was associated with perinatal transmission (109). Drug-resistant virus may have decreased fitness in terms of perinatal transmission; in a study of the preceding cohort of women that evaluated transmitting mother/infant pairs, only wild-type virus was transmitted to infected infants born to infected women with mixed populations of wild type and low level ZDV resistant virus (110). In a Swiss study in of 62 HIV-infected women, 10% had virus with high level ZDV resistance, but none of the women transmitted HIV-1 to their infant despite receiving only ZDV prophylaxis (111). Antiretroviral resistance testing is expensive, difficult to interpret, and data to support its routine use in pregnancy outside of standard indications in non-pregnant individuals is currently lacking. Further, if a woman’s therapeutic regimen is successful (e.g., HIV-1RNA is reduced to <1,000 copies/mL) it both suggests that resistance has not occurred and that transmission will be very unlikely regardless of the results of resistance testing. Therefore, at present, recommendations for resistance testing in HIV-infected pregnant women are the same as for non-pregnant patients: acute HIV infection and virologic failure or suboptimal viral suppression after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (14).

Some women receiving antiretroviral therapy may realize they are pregnant early in gestation, and concern for potential teratogenicity may lead some to consider temporarily stopping antiretroviral treatment until after the first trimester. Data are insufficient to support or refute the teratogenic risk of antiretroviral drugs when administered during the first 10 weeks of gestation; certain drugs are more of concern than others. (Table 2 and see **SAFETY AND TOXICITY OF INDIVIDUAL ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS IN PREGNANCY **). The decision to continue therapy during the first trimester should be carefully considered and discussed between the clinician and the pregnant woman. Such considerations include gestational age of the fetus; the woman's clinical, immunologic, and virologic status; and the known and unknown potential effects of the antiretroviral drugs on the fetus. If antiretroviral therapy is discontinued during the first trimester, all agents should be stopped and restarted simultaneously in the second trimester to avoid the development of drug resistance. No data are available to address whether transient discontinuation of therapy is harmful for the woman and/or fetus.

Some health-care providers might consider administration of ZDV in combination with other antiretroviral drugs to newborns of women with a history of prior antiretroviral therapy— particularly in situations where the woman is infected with HIV-1 with documented high-level ZDV resistance, has had disease progression while receiving ZDV, or has had extensive prior ZDV monotherapy. However, the efficacy of this approach is not known. The appropriate dose and short- and long-term safety for most antiretroviral agents other than ZDV are not defined for neonates. The half-lives of ZDV, 3TC, and nevirapine are prolonged during the neonatal period as a result of immature liver metabolism and renal function, requiring specific dosing adjustments when these antiretrovirals are administered to neonates. Data regarding the pharmacokinetics of other antiretroviral drugs in neonates are not yet available, although phase I neonatal studies of several other antiretrovirals are ongoing. The infected woman should be counseled regarding the theoretical benefit of combination antiretroviral drugs for the neonate, the potential risks, and what is known about appropriate dosing of the drugs in newborn infants. She should also be informed that use of antiretroviral drugs in addition to ZDV for newborn prophylaxis is of unknown efficacy for reducing risk for perinatal transmission.

See Table 3: Clinical Scenarios and Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Reduce Periantal Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission

Scenario #3: HIV-Infected Women in Labor Who Have Had No Prior Therapy

Recommendation
Several effective regimens are available (Table 4). These include: 1) single dose nevirapine at the onset of labor followed by a single dose of nevirapine for the newborn at age 48 hours; 2) oral ZDV and 3TC during labor, followed by one week of oral ZDV/3TC for the newborn; 3) intrapartum intravenous ZDV followed by 6 weeks of ZDV for the newborn; and 4) the 2-dose nevirapine regimen combined with intrapartum intravenous ZDV and 6 week ZDV for the newborn.

In the immediate postpartum period, the woman should have appropriate assessments (e.g., CD4+ count and HIV-1 RNA copy number) to determine whether antiretroviral therapy is recommended for her own health.

Discussion
While intrapartum antiretroviral drug medications will not prevent perinatal transmission that occurs before labor, most transmission occurs near to the time of or during labor and delivery. Pre-exposure prophylaxis can be provided by administration of a drug to the mother that rapidly crosses the placenta to produce systemic antiretroviral drug levels in the fetus during intensive exposure to HIV in maternal genital secretions and blood during birth.

Several intrapartum/neonatal antiretroviral prophylaxis regimens are applicable for women in labor who have had no prior antiretroviral therapy (Table 4). Two regimens, one using a 2-dose regimen of nevirapine and the other a combination ZDV and 3TC regimen, were shown to reduce perinatal transmission in randomized clinical trials in breastfeeding settings, while available epidemiologic data suggest efficacy of a third, ZDV-only regimen. The fourth regimen, combining ZDV with nevirapine, is based upon theoretical considerations.

In the HIVNET 012 trial, conducted in Uganda, a single dose of oral nevirapine given to women at the onset of labor and a single dose to the infant at age 48 hours was compared to oral ZDV given to the woman every 3 hours during labor and postnatally to the infant for 7 days (Table 4). At age 6 weeks, the rates of transmission were 12% (95% CI 8-16%) in the nevirapine arm compared to 21% (95% CI, 16-26%) in the ZDV arm, a 47% reduction (95% CI, 20-64%) in transmission (61). No significant short-term toxicity was observed in either group. Because there was no placebo group, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the efficacy of the intrapartum/1 week neonatal ZDV regimen compared to no treatment.

In the PETRA trial, conducted in Uganda, South Africa and Tanzania, ZDV and 3TC were administered orally intrapartum and to the woman and infant for 7 days postnatally. Oral ZDV and 3TC were given at the onset of labor and continued until delivery (Table 4). Postnatally, the woman and infant received ZDV and 3TC every 12 hours for 7 days. At age 6 weeks, the rates of transmission were 10% in the ZDV/3TC arm compared to 17% in the placebo arm, a 38% reduction in transmission (60). However, no differences in transmission were observed when oral ZDV and 3TC were administered only during the intrapartum period (transmission of 16% in the ZDV/3TC and 17% in the placebo arm), indicating that some post-exposure prophylaxis is needed, at least in breastfeeding settings.

These clinical trials were conducted in Africa, where the majority of women breastfeed their infants. Because HIV can be transmitted by breast milk and the highest risk period for such transmission is the first few months of life (108), the absolute transmission rates observed in the African trials may not be comparable to what might be observed with these regimens in HIV-infected women in the U.S., where breastfeeding is not recommended. However, comparison of the percent reduction in transmission at early timepoints (e.g., four to six weeks) may be applicable. In the effective arms of the PETRA trial, antiretrovirals were administered postnatally to the mother as well as the infant to reduce the risk of early breastmilk transmission. In the United States, administration of ZDV/3TC to the mother postnatally in addition to the infant would not be required for prophylaxis against transmission because HIV-infected women are advised not to breastfeed their infants (although ZDV/3TC might be indicated as part of a combination postnatal treatment regimen for the woman).

Epidemiologic data from New York State indicate than intravenous maternal intrapartum ZDV followed by oral ZDV for 6 weeks to the infant may significantly reduce transmission compared to no treatment (Table 4). Transmission rates were 10% (95% CI [CI], 3-22%) with intrapartum and neonatal ZDV compared to 27% (95% CI, 21-33%) in the absence of ZDV, a 62% reduction in risk (95% CI, 19-82%) (49). Similarly, in epidemiologic study in North Carolina, intravenous intrapartum and 6 week oral neonatal ZDV treatment was associated with a transmission rate of 11%, compared to 31% without therapy (6). However, intrapartum ZDV combined with very short postnatal infant ZDV administration, such as the 1-week postnatal infant ZDV course in HIVNET 012 (62), has not proven effective to date. This underscores the necessity of recommending a full 6 week course of infant treatment when ZDV alone is utilized.

There are currently no data to address the relative efficacy of these three intrapartum/neonatal antiretroviral regimens for prevention of transmission. There is overlap in the 95% CI for the two-dose nevirapine regimen and the maternal intravenous intrapartum/six week infant oral ZDV regimen. In the absence of data to suggest the superiority of one or more of the possible regimens, choice should be based upon the specific circumstances of each woman. The two-dose nevirapine regimen offers the advantage of lower cost, the possibility of directly observed therapy and increased adherence compared to the other two regimens. In South Africa, a clinical trial (SAINT) compared the two-dose nevirapine and the intrapartum/postpartum ZDV/3TC regimens. No significant differences were observed between the two regimens in terms of efficacy in reducing transmission or in maternal and infant toxicity (109).

Whether combining intravenous intrapartum/6 week neonatal oral ZDV with the 2-dose nevirapine regimen will provide additional benefit over that observed with each regimen alone is unproven. Clinical trial data have clearly established that combination is superior to single drug therapy for treatment of established infection, although data to show superiority of combination treatment when used for prevention of transmission are not available. However, infants born to women in labor who have not received any antiretroviral therapy are at high risk for infection. The 2-dose nevirapine regimen had no significant short-term drug-associated toxicity in the 313 mother-infant pairs exposed to the regimen in the HIVNET 012 trial. Nevirapine and ZDV are synergistic in inhibiting HIV replication in vitro (110), and both nevirapine and ZDV rapidly cross the placenta to achieve drug levels in the infant nearly equal to those in the mother. In contrast to ZDV, nevirapine can decrease plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration by at least 1.3 log by 7 days after a single dose (111) and is active immediately against intracellular and extracellular virus (112). However, nevirapine resistance can be induced by a single mutation at codon 181, whereas high-level resistance to ZDV requires several mutations.

A theoretical benefit of combining the intrapartum/neonatal ZDV and nevirapine regimens includes potential efficacy if the woman had acquired infection with HIV that is resistant to either ZDV or nevirapine. Perinatal transmission of antiretroviral drug-resistant virus has been reported but appears to be unusual (6, 52, 113, 114). The prevalence of ZDV, nevirapine and other antiretroviral drug resistance among newly infected white homosexual men in the U.S. has varied between 2-16% depending on geographic area and the type of assay (e.g., genotypic or phenotypic) used (114-117). Little data are available relative to the prevalence of drug resistant virus among untreated pregnant women. Mutations associated with ZDV resistance were detected in 19% and nevirapine resistance in 1% of women treated with ZDV during pregnancy between 1991 and 1997 in one study; however, resistant virus was no more likely to be transmitted than wild type virus (118). Virus with low level ZDV resistance may be less likely to establish infection than wild type, and transmission may not occur even when maternal virus has high level ZDV resistance (106, 107, 114, 118). Since the prevalence of drug-resistant virus is an evolving phenomenon, surveillance is needed to determine the prevalence of drug-resistant virus in pregnant women over time and the risk of transmission of resistant viral strains. The potential benefits of combination prophylaxis with intrapartum/neonatal nevirapine and ZDV must be weighed against the increased cost, possible adherence issues, potential short and long-term toxicity, and the lack of definitive data to show that the combination offers any additional benefit for prevention of transmission compared to use of either drug alone.

See Table 4: Comparison of Intrapartum/Postpartum Regimens for HIV-Infected Women in Labor Who Have Had No Prior Antiretroviral Therapy (Scenario 3)

Scenario #4: Infants Born to Mothers Who Have Received No Antiretroviral Therapy During Pregnancy or Intrapartum

Recommendation
The 6-week neonatal ZDV component of the ZDV chemoprophylactic regimen should be discussed with the mother and offered for the newborn. ZDV should be initiated as soon as possible after delivery - preferably within 6-12 hours of birth. Some clinicians may choose to use ZDV in combination with other antiretroviral drugs, particularly if the mother is known or suspected to have ZDV-resistant virus. However, the efficacy of this approach for prevention of transmission is unknown, and appropriate dosing regimens for neonates are incompletely defined. In the immediate postpartum period, the woman should undergo appropriate assessments (e.g., CD4+ count and HIV-1 RNA copy number) to determine if antiretroviral therapy is required for her own health. The infant should undergo early diagnostic testing so that if HIV-infected, treatment can be initiated as soon as possible.

Discussion
Definitive data are not available to address whether ZDV administered solely during the neonatal period would reduce the risk for perinatal transmission. Epidemiologic data from a New York State study suggest a decline in transmission when infants were given zidovudine for the first 6 weeks of life compared to no prophylaxis (62, 63). Transmission rates were 9% (95% CI, 4.1%-17.5%) for newborn only ZDV prophylaxis (initiated within 48 hours after birth) compared to 18% (95% CI, 7.7%-34.3%) when initiated after 48 hours and 27% (95% CI 21%-33%) with no ZDV prophylaxis (62). Epidemiologic data from North Carolina did not demonstrate a benefit of newborn only ZDV compared to no prophylaxis (6). Transmission rates were 27% (95%CI 8-55%) for newborn only prophylaxis and 31% (95%CI 24-39%) for no prophylaxis; the timing of infant prophylaxis initiation was not defined in this study. Data from a case-control study of postexposure prophylaxis of health-care workers who had nosocomial percutaneous exposure to blood from HIV-1 infected persons indicate that ZDV administration was associated with a 79% reduction in the risk for HIV-1 seroconversion following exposure (64). Postexposure prophylaxis also has prevented retroviral infection in some studies involving animals (123-125).

The interval for which benefit may be gained from postexposure prophylaxis is undefined. When prophylaxis was delayed beyond 48 hours after birth in the New York State study, no efficacy could be demonstrated. Most infants initiated prophylaxis within 24 hours in this study (63). Data from studies of animals indicate that the longer the delay in institution of prophylaxis, the less likely that prevention will be observed. In most studies of animals, antiretroviral prophylaxis initiated 24-36 hours after exposure usually is not effective for preventing infection, although later administration has been associated with decreased viremia (119-121). In cats, ZDV treatment initiated within the first 4 days after challenge with feline leukemia virus afforded protection, whereas treatment initiated 1 week postexposure did not prevent infection (122). The relevance of these animal studies to prevention of perinatal HIV transmission in humans is unknown. HIV-1 infection is established in most infected infants by age 1 to 2 weeks. Of 271 infected infants, HIV-1 DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 38% of infected infants tested within 48 hours of birth. No substantial change in diagnostic sensitivity was observed within the first week of life, but detection rose rapidly during the second week of life, reaching 93% by age 14 days (123). Initiation of postexposure prophylaxis after the age of 2 days is not likely to be efficacious in preventing transmission, and by 14 days of age infection would already be established in most infants.

When neither the antenatal nor intrapartum parts of the three-part ZDV regimen are received by the mother, administration of antiretroviral drugs to the newborn provides chemoprophylaxis only after HIV-1 exposure has already occurred. Some clinicians view this situation as analogous to nosocomial postexposure prophylaxis and may wish to provide ZDV in combination with one or more other antiretroviral agents. Such a decision must be accompanied by a discussion with the woman of the potential benefits and risks of this approach and the lack of data to address its efficacy and safety.

See Table 3: Clinical Scenarios and Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Reduce Periantal Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission





Copyright © 2001-2002. The National AIDS Education and Training Centers Program on behalf of its AETC National Resource Center. All rights reserved.

Physicians and other health care professionals are encouraged to consult other sources and confirm the information contained in this site because no single reference or service can take the place of medical training, education, and experience. Consumers are cautioned that this site is not intended to provide medical advice about any specific medical condition they may have or treatment they may need, and they are encouraged to call or see their physician or other health care provider promptly with any health related questions they may have.