
|
Antiretroviral
Clinical Scenarios
Scenario #1: HIV-Infected Pregnant Women Who Have Not Received
Prior Antiretroviral Therapy
Recommendation
Pregnant women with HIV infection
must receive standard clinical, immunologic, and virologic evaluation.
Recommendations for initiation and choice of antiretroviral therapy
should be based on the same parameters used for persons who are
not pregnant, although the known and unknown risks and benefits
of such therapy during pregnancy must be considered and discussed
(14). The three-part ZDV chemoprophylaxis regimen,
initiated after the first trimester,
should be recommended for all pregnant
women with HIV infection regardless of antenatal HIV RNA copy number
to reduce the risk for perinatal transmission. The combination of
ZDV chemoprophylaxis with additional antiretroviral drugs for treatment
of HIV infection is recommended for infected women whose clinical,
immunologic or virologic status requires treatment or
who have HIV RNA over 1,000 copies/mL regardless of clinical
or immunologic status. Women who are in the first trimester of pregnancy
may consider delaying initiation of therapy until after
10-12 weeks' gestation.
Discussion
When ZDV is administered in the three-part PACTG 07 regimen, perinatal
transmission is reduced by approximately 70%. The mechanism by which
ZDV reduces transmission is not known.
However, protection is likely multifactorial. Pre-exposure prophylaxis
of the infant is provided by passage of ZDV across the placenta.
Thus, inhibitory levels of the drug are present in the fetus during
the birth process. While placental passage of ZDV is excellent,
other antiretroviral drugs have variable transplacental passage
(Table 2). Therefore, when
combination antiretroviral therapy is initiated during pregnancy,
ZDV should be included as a component of antenatal therapy whenever
possible. Since the mechanism by which ZDV reduces transmission
is not known, the intrapartum and newborn ZDV parts of the chemoprophylactic
regimen should be administered to reduce perinatal HIV transmission.
If a woman does not receive ZDV as a component of her antenatal
antiretroviral regimen, intrapartum and newborn ZDV should continue
to be recommended.
Women should be counseled that potent combination
antiretroviral regimens have substantial benefit for their own health
and may provide enhanced protection against perinatal transmission.
Several studies have indicated that women with low or undetectable
HIV-1 RNA levels (e.g. <1,000 copies/mL) have extremely low rates
of perinatal transmission, particularly when antiretroviral therapy
has been received (70, 71, 81). However, there is no threshold
below which lack of transmission can be assured, and the long-term
effects of in utero exposure to multiple antiretroviral drugs
is unknown. Decisions regarding the use and choice of an antiretroviral
regimen should be individualized based on discussion with the woman
about a) her risk for disease progression and the risks and benefits
of delaying initiation of therapy; b) possible benefit of lowering
viral load for reducing perinatal transmission; c) potential drug
toxicities and interactions with other drugs; d) the need for strict
adherence to the prescribed drug schedule to avoid the development
of drug resistance; e) unknown long-term effects of in utero
drug exposure on the infant; and f) pre-clinical, animal, and clinical
data relevant to use of the currently available antiretrovirals
during pregnancy. Due to the evolving and complex nature of the
management of HIV-1 infection, a specialist with experience in the
treatment of pregnant women with HIV infection
should be involved in their care.
Because the period of organogenesis (when the fetus is most susceptible
to potential teratogenic effects of drugs) is during the first 10
weeks of gestation and the risks of antiretroviral therapy during
that period are unknown, women who are in the first trimester of
pregnancy may wish to consider delaying initiation of therapy until
after 10-12 weeks' gestation. This decision should be carefully
considered and discussed between the health-care provider and the
patient; such a discussion should include an assessment of the woman's
health status and the benefits and risks of delaying initiation
of therapy for several weeks, and the knowledge that most
perinatal HIV-1 transmission likely occurs late in pregnancy or
during delivery. Treatment with efavirenz should be avoided during
the first trimester because significant teratogenic effects in rhesus
macaques were seen at drug exposures similar to those representing
human exposure. Hydroxyurea is a potent teratogen in a variety of
animal species and should also be avoided during the first trimester
(Table 2 and see **SAFETY
AND TOXICITY OF INDIVIDUAL ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS IN PREGNANCY
**).
When initiation of antiretroviral therapy would be considered
optional based on current guidelines for treatment of non-pregnant
individuals (14), infected pregnant women should be counseled regarding
the potential benefits of standard combination therapy and should
be offered such therapy, including the three-part ZDV chemoprophylaxis
regimen. Although such women are at low risk for clinical disease
progression if combination therapy is delayed, antiretroviral therapy
that successfully reduces HIV-1 RNA to levels below 1,000 copies/mL
may substantially lower the risk of perinatal HIV-1 transmission
and limit consideration of elective cesarean delivery as an intervention
to reduce transmission risk.
When combination therapy
is administered, the regimen should be chosen from those recommended
for non-pregnant adults (14). Dual nucleoside analogue therapy without
the addition of either a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitor is not recommended due to the potential
for inadequate viral suppression and rapid development of resistance
(99). If combination therapy is given principally to reduce perinatal
transmission and would have been optional for treatment of non-pregnant
individuals, consideration may be given to discontinuing therapy
postnatally, with the decision to reinitiate treatment based on
standard criteria for non-pregnant individuals. If drugs are discontinued
postnatally, all drugs should be stopped simultaneously. Discussion
regarding the decision to continue or stop combination therapy postpartum
should occur prior to initiation of therapy during pregnancy.
Use of antiretroviral prophylaxis has been shown to provide benefit
in preventing perinatal transmission even for infected pregnant
women with HIV-1 RNA levels < 1,000 copies/mL. In a meta-analysis
of factors associated with perinatal transmission among women who
had infected infants despite having HIV-1 RNA <1,000 copies/mL
at or near delivery, transmission was only 1.0% among women receiving
antenatal antiretroviral therapy (primarily ZDV alone) compared
to 9.8% among those receiving no antenatal therapy (100).
Therefore, use of antiretroviral prophylaxis is recommended for
all pregnant women with HIV infection regardless of antenatal HIV
RNA level.
The time-limited use of ZDV alone during pregnancy for chemoprophylaxis
of perinatal transmission is controversial. The potential benefits
of standard combination antiretroviral regimens for treatment of
HIV infection should be discussed with and offered to all pregnant
women with HIV infection regardless of viral load, and is recommended
for all pregnant women with HIV-1 RNA levels >1,000 copies/mL.
However, some women may wish to restrict exposure of their fetus
to antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy but still wish to reduce
the risk of transmitting HIV to their infant. Additionally, for
women with HIV-1 RNA levels <1,000 copies/mL, time-limited use
of ZDV during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy is less
likely to induce the development of resistance due to the limited
viral replication existing in the patient and the time-limited exposure
to the antiretroviral drug. For example, the development of ZDV
resistance was unusual among the healthy population of women who
participated in PACTG 076 (52). The use of ZDV chemoprophylaxis
alone during pregnancy might be an appropriate option for these
women.
See Table 3: Clinical Scenarios and
Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Reduce Periantal
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission
Scenario #2: HIV-Infected Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy
During the Current Pregnancy
Recommendation
HIV-1 infected women receiving antiretroviral therapy in whom pregnancy
is identified after the first trimester should continue therapy.
ZDV should be a component
of the antenatal antiretroviral treatment regimen after the first
trimester whenever possible, although this may not always be feasible.
For women receiving such therapy in whom pregnancy is recognized
during the first trimester, the woman should be counseled regarding
the benefits and potential risks of antiretroviral administration
during this period, and continuation of therapy should be considered.
If therapy is discontinued during the first trimester, all drugs
should be stopped and reintroduced simultaneously to avoid the development
of drug resistance. Regardless of the antepartum antiretroviral
regimen, ZDV administration is recommended during the intrapartum
period and for the newborn. Recommendations for resistance testing
in HIV-infected pregnant women are the same as for non-pregnant
patients: acute HIV infection and virologic failure or suboptimal
viral suppression after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.
Discussion
Women who have been receiving antiretroviral treatment for their
HIV infection should continue treatment during pregnancy. Discontinuation
of therapy could lead to an increase in viral load, which could
result in decline in immune status and disease progression and result
in adverse consequences for both the fetus and the woman.
ZDV should be a component of the antenatal antiretroviral treatment
whenever possible. However, there may be circumstances where this
is not feasible, such as the occurrence of significant ZDV-related
toxicity. Additionally, women receiving an antiretroviral regimen
that does not contain ZDV but who have HIV-1 RNA levels that are
consistently very low or undetectable (e.g., <1,000 copies/mL)
have a very low risk of perinatal transmission (81), and
there may be concerns that the addition of ZDV to the current regimen
could compromise adherence to treatment.
The maternal antenatal
antiretroviral treatment regimen should be continued on schedule
as much as possible during labor to provide maximal virologic effect
and to minimize the chance of development of drug resistance. If
a woman has not received ZDV as a component of her antenatal therapeutic
antiretroviral regimen, intravenous ZDV should still be administered
to the pregnant woman during the intrapartum period whenever feasible.
Because ZDV and d4T should not be administered together due to potential
pharmacologic antagonsim, options for women receiving oral d4T as
part of their antenatal therapy include continuation of oral d4T
during labor without intravenous ZDV, or withholding oral d4T during
the period of intravenous ZDV administration during labor. Additionally,
the infant should receive the standard 6 week course of ZDV.
For women with suboptimal
suppression of HIV-1 RNA (e.g., above 1,000 copies/mL) near the
time of delivery despite prenatal receipt of ZDV prophylaxis and/or
combination antiretroviral therapy, there are currently no data
to demonstrate that administration of additional antiretroviral
drugs during labor and delivery provides added protection against
perinatal transmission. In the HIVNET 012 study in Ugandan women
without antenatal antiretroviral therapy, a two-dose nevirapine
regimen (single dose to the woman at the onset of labor and single
dose to the infant at age 48 hours) significantly reduced perinatal
transmission compared to a ultra-short intrapartum/1 week postpartum
ZDV regimen (61). In women in the United States, Europe,
Brazil and the Bahamas who are receiving antenatal antiretroviral
therapy, PACTG 316 is evaluating the addition of the same two-dose
intrapartum/postpartum nevirapine regimen to standard therapy compared
to the addition of a nevirapine placebo. Final results of PACTG
316 are anticipated in early 2001, but due to an unexpectedly low
overall transmission rate, the study will have limited power to
address whether nevirapine provides any additional benefit for reducing
transmission in women who have received antenatal therapy.
Selection of nevirapine-resistant
virus was found at 6 weeks postpartum in pregnant women receiving
a single dose of nevirapine during labor. In HIVNET 012, where drugs
other than nevirapine were not given, 7 of 31 women (23%) evaluated.developed
genotypic resistance mutations at 6 weeks postpartum; these mutations
were no longer present in 4 women studied at 13-18 months postpartum
(105, 106). In the antiretroviral-treated women in PACTG
316, 4 of 32 women (13%, 95% CI 4-25%) with HIV-1 RNA above 3,000
copies/mL at delivery who received nevirapine developed genotypic
nevirapine resistance mutations compared to none of 38 women in
the placebo arm (107).
The duration that nevirapine-resistant mutations persist following
the removal of the selective pressure induced by the single dose
of nevirapine in women with and without antenatal antiretroviral
treatment remains unclear. The clinical implications of these findings
for future maternal treatment options, especially among women with
access to standard combination antiretroviral therapies, remain
unknown at present. If the addition of the two-dose nevirapine regimen
to existing antiretroviral therapy is considered for a woman currently
receiving treatment, the potential implications for future maternal
therapy and the unproven benefit in further reducing transmission
need to be weighed very carefully and discussed with the woman.
Guidelines on decisions related to obstetric interventions to reduce
perinatal transmission in antiretroviral-treated women with suboptimal
virologic suppression near the time of delivery are outlined in
the "Perinatal HIV-1 Transmission and Mode of Delivery"
section of this document.
The impact of prior antiretroviral exposure on the efficacy of
ZDV chemoprophylaxis is unclear. Data from PACTG 185 indicate that
duration of prior ZDV therapy in women with advanced HIV-1 disease,
many of whom received prolonged ZDV before pregnancy, was not associated
with diminished ZDV efficacy for reduction of transmission (57).
Perinatal transmission rates were similar for women who first initiated
ZDV during pregnancy and women who had received ZDV prior to pregnancy.
Thus, a history of ZDV therapy before the current pregnancy should
not limit recommendations for administration of ZDV chemoprophylaxis
to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission.
Some clinicians have recommended antiretroviral drug resistance
testing for all pregnant women, although this is controversial (108).
Although perinatal transmission of ZDV-resistant virus has been
reported, it is unclear if the presence of genotypic drug resistance
mutations increase the risk of transmission, and the utility of
resistance testing in pregnant women receiving antitretroviral treatment
who have successful virologic control is minimal. In PACTG 076,
the prevalence and incidence of ZDV resistance was low (3%) and
the presence of resistance did not correlate with transmission (52).
However, in a cohort of women with more advanced disease who were
receiving antenatal monotherapy with ZDV between 1989-1994 (prior
to the results of.January 24, 2001 PACTG 076), the prevalence of
ZDV resistance was 24%; in multivariate analysis, the presence of
ZDV drug resistance was associated with perinatal transmission (109).
Drug-resistant virus may have decreased fitness in terms of perinatal
transmission; in a study of the preceding cohort of women that evaluated
transmitting mother/infant pairs, only wild-type virus was transmitted
to infected infants born to infected women with mixed populations
of wild type and low level ZDV resistant virus (110). In
a Swiss study in of 62 HIV-infected women, 10% had virus with high
level ZDV resistance, but none of the women transmitted HIV-1 to
their infant despite receiving only ZDV prophylaxis (111).
Antiretroviral resistance testing is expensive, difficult to interpret,
and data to support its routine use in pregnancy outside of standard
indications in non-pregnant individuals is currently lacking. Further,
if a woman’s therapeutic regimen is successful (e.g., HIV-1RNA is
reduced to <1,000 copies/mL) it both suggests that resistance
has not occurred and that transmission will be very unlikely regardless
of the results of resistance testing. Therefore, at present, recommendations
for resistance testing in HIV-infected pregnant women are the same
as for non-pregnant patients: acute HIV infection and virologic
failure or suboptimal viral suppression after initiation of antiretroviral
therapy (14).
Some women receiving antiretroviral therapy may realize they are
pregnant early in gestation, and concern for potential teratogenicity
may lead some to consider temporarily stopping antiretroviral treatment
until after the first trimester. Data are insufficient to support
or refute the teratogenic risk of antiretroviral drugs when administered
during the first 10 weeks of gestation; certain drugs are more of
concern than others. (Table 2
and see **SAFETY
AND TOXICITY OF INDIVIDUAL ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS IN PREGNANCY
**). The decision to continue therapy during the first trimester
should be carefully considered and discussed between the clinician
and the pregnant woman. Such considerations include gestational
age of the fetus; the woman's clinical, immunologic, and virologic
status; and the known and unknown potential effects of the antiretroviral
drugs on the fetus. If antiretroviral therapy is discontinued during
the first trimester, all agents should be stopped and restarted
simultaneously in the second trimester to avoid the development
of drug resistance. No data are available to address whether transient
discontinuation of therapy is harmful for the woman and/or fetus.
Some health-care providers might consider administration of ZDV
in combination with other antiretroviral drugs to newborns of women
with a history of prior antiretroviral therapy— particularly in
situations where the woman is infected with HIV-1 with documented
high-level ZDV resistance, has had disease progression while receiving
ZDV, or has had extensive prior ZDV monotherapy. However, the efficacy
of this approach is not known. The appropriate dose and short- and
long-term safety for most antiretroviral agents other than ZDV are
not defined for neonates. The
half-lives of ZDV, 3TC, and nevirapine are prolonged during the
neonatal period as a result of immature liver metabolism and renal
function, requiring specific dosing adjustments when these antiretrovirals
are administered to neonates. Data regarding the pharmacokinetics
of other antiretroviral drugs in neonates are not yet available,
although phase I neonatal studies of several other antiretrovirals
are ongoing. The infected woman should be counseled regarding the
theoretical benefit of combination antiretroviral drugs for the
neonate, the potential risks, and what is known about appropriate
dosing of the drugs in newborn infants. She should also be informed
that use of antiretroviral drugs in addition to ZDV for newborn
prophylaxis is of unknown efficacy for reducing risk for perinatal
transmission.
See Table 3: Clinical Scenarios and
Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Reduce Periantal
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission
Scenario #3: HIV-Infected Women in Labor Who Have Had No Prior
Therapy
Recommendation
Several effective regimens are available (Table
4). These include: 1) single dose nevirapine at the onset of
labor followed by a single dose of nevirapine for the newborn at
age 48 hours; 2) oral ZDV and 3TC during labor, followed by one
week of oral ZDV/3TC for the newborn; 3) intrapartum intravenous
ZDV followed by 6 weeks of ZDV for the newborn; and 4) the 2-dose
nevirapine regimen combined with intrapartum intravenous ZDV and
6 week ZDV for the newborn.
In
the immediate postpartum period, the woman should have appropriate
assessments (e.g., CD4+ count and HIV-1 RNA copy number) to determine
whether antiretroviral therapy is recommended for her own health.
Discussion
While
intrapartum antiretroviral drug medications will not prevent perinatal
transmission that occurs before labor, most transmission occurs
near to the time of or during labor and delivery. Pre-exposure prophylaxis
can be provided by administration of a drug to the mother that rapidly
crosses the placenta to produce systemic antiretroviral drug levels
in the fetus during intensive exposure to HIV in maternal genital
secretions and blood during birth.
Several
intrapartum/neonatal antiretroviral prophylaxis regimens are applicable
for women in labor who have had no prior antiretroviral therapy
(Table 4). Two regimens, one using
a 2-dose regimen of nevirapine and the other a combination ZDV and
3TC regimen, were shown to reduce perinatal transmission in randomized
clinical trials in breastfeeding settings, while available epidemiologic
data suggest efficacy of a third, ZDV-only regimen. The fourth regimen,
combining ZDV with nevirapine, is based upon theoretical considerations.
In
the HIVNET 012 trial, conducted in Uganda, a single dose of oral
nevirapine given to women at the onset of labor and a single dose
to the infant at age 48 hours was compared to oral ZDV given to
the woman every 3 hours during labor and postnatally to the infant
for 7 days (Table 4). At age 6
weeks, the rates of transmission were 12% (95% CI 8-16%) in the
nevirapine arm compared to 21% (95% CI, 16-26%) in the ZDV arm,
a 47% reduction (95% CI, 20-64%) in transmission (61). No
significant short-term toxicity was observed in either group. Because
there was no placebo group, no conclusions can be drawn regarding
the efficacy of the intrapartum/1 week neonatal ZDV regimen compared
to no treatment.
In
the PETRA trial, conducted in Uganda, South Africa and Tanzania,
ZDV and 3TC were administered orally intrapartum and to the woman
and infant for 7 days postnatally. Oral ZDV and 3TC were given at
the onset of labor and continued until delivery (Table
4). Postnatally, the woman and infant received ZDV and 3TC every
12 hours for 7 days. At age 6 weeks, the rates of transmission were
10% in the ZDV/3TC arm compared to 17% in the placebo arm, a 38%
reduction in transmission (60). However, no differences in
transmission were observed when oral ZDV and 3TC were administered
only during the intrapartum period (transmission of 16% in the ZDV/3TC
and 17% in the placebo arm), indicating that some post-exposure
prophylaxis is needed, at least in breastfeeding settings.
These
clinical trials were conducted in Africa, where the majority of
women breastfeed their infants. Because HIV can be transmitted by
breast milk and the highest risk period for such transmission is
the first few months of life (108), the absolute transmission
rates observed in the African trials may not be comparable to what
might be observed with these regimens in HIV-infected women in the
U.S., where breastfeeding is not recommended. However, comparison
of the percent reduction in transmission at early timepoints (e.g.,
four to six weeks) may be applicable. In the effective arms of the
PETRA trial, antiretrovirals were administered postnatally to the
mother as well as the infant to reduce the risk of early breastmilk
transmission. In the United States, administration of ZDV/3TC to
the mother postnatally in addition to the infant would not be required
for prophylaxis against transmission because HIV-infected women
are advised not to breastfeed their infants (although ZDV/3TC might
be indicated as part of a combination postnatal treatment regimen
for the woman).
Epidemiologic
data from New York State indicate than intravenous maternal intrapartum
ZDV followed by oral ZDV for 6 weeks to the infant may significantly
reduce transmission compared to no treatment (Table
4). Transmission rates were 10% (95% CI [CI], 3-22%) with intrapartum
and neonatal ZDV compared to 27% (95% CI, 21-33%) in the absence
of ZDV, a 62% reduction in risk (95% CI, 19-82%) (49). Similarly,
in epidemiologic study in North Carolina, intravenous intrapartum
and 6 week oral neonatal ZDV treatment was associated with a transmission
rate of 11%, compared to 31% without therapy (6). However,
intrapartum ZDV combined with very short postnatal infant ZDV administration,
such as the 1-week postnatal infant ZDV course in HIVNET 012 (62),
has not proven effective to date. This underscores the necessity
of recommending a full 6 week course of infant treatment when ZDV
alone is utilized.
There
are currently no data to address the relative efficacy of these
three intrapartum/neonatal antiretroviral regimens for prevention
of transmission. There is overlap in the 95% CI for the two-dose
nevirapine regimen and the maternal intravenous intrapartum/six
week infant oral ZDV regimen. In the absence of data to suggest
the superiority of one or more of the possible regimens, choice
should be based upon the specific circumstances of each woman. The
two-dose nevirapine regimen offers the advantage of lower cost,
the possibility of directly observed therapy and increased adherence
compared to the other two regimens. In South Africa,
a clinical trial (SAINT) compared the two-dose nevirapine and the
intrapartum/postpartum ZDV/3TC regimens. No significant differences
were observed between the two regimens in terms of efficacy in reducing
transmission or in maternal and infant toxicity (109).
Whether combining intravenous intrapartum/6 week neonatal oral
ZDV with the 2-dose nevirapine regimen will provide additional benefit
over that observed with each regimen alone is unproven. Clinical
trial data have clearly established that combination is superior
to single drug therapy for treatment of established infection, although
data to show superiority of combination treatment when used for
prevention of transmission are not available. However, infants born
to women in labor who have not received any antiretroviral therapy
are at high risk for infection. The 2-dose nevirapine regimen had
no significant short-term drug-associated toxicity in the 313 mother-infant
pairs exposed to the regimen in the HIVNET 012 trial. Nevirapine
and ZDV are synergistic in inhibiting HIV replication in vitro
(110), and both nevirapine and ZDV rapidly cross the placenta
to achieve drug levels in the infant nearly equal to those in the
mother. In contrast to ZDV, nevirapine can decrease plasma HIV-1
RNA concentration by at least 1.3 log by 7 days after a single dose
(111) and is active immediately against intracellular and
extracellular virus (112). However, nevirapine resistance
can be induced by a single mutation at codon 181, whereas high-level
resistance to ZDV requires several mutations.
A
theoretical benefit of combining the intrapartum/neonatal ZDV and
nevirapine regimens includes potential efficacy if the woman had
acquired infection with HIV that is resistant to either ZDV or nevirapine.
Perinatal transmission of antiretroviral drug-resistant virus has
been reported but appears to be unusual (6, 52, 113, 114).
The prevalence of ZDV, nevirapine and other antiretroviral drug
resistance among newly infected white homosexual men in the U.S.
has varied between 2-16% depending on geographic area and the type
of assay (e.g., genotypic or phenotypic) used (114-117).
Little data are available relative to the prevalence of drug resistant
virus among untreated pregnant women. Mutations associated with
ZDV resistance were detected in 19% and nevirapine resistance in
1% of women treated with ZDV during pregnancy between 1991 and 1997
in one study; however, resistant virus was no more likely to be
transmitted than wild type virus (118). Virus with low level
ZDV resistance may be less likely to establish infection than wild
type, and transmission may not occur even when maternal virus has
high level ZDV resistance (106, 107, 114, 118). Since the
prevalence of drug-resistant virus is an evolving phenomenon, surveillance
is needed to determine the prevalence of drug-resistant virus in
pregnant women over time and the risk of transmission of resistant
viral strains. The potential benefits of combination prophylaxis
with intrapartum/neonatal nevirapine and ZDV must be weighed against
the increased cost, possible adherence issues, potential short and
long-term toxicity, and the lack of definitive data to show that
the combination offers any additional benefit for prevention of
transmission compared to use of either drug alone.
See
Table 4: Comparison of Intrapartum/Postpartum Regimens for HIV-Infected
Women in Labor Who Have Had No Prior Antiretroviral Therapy (Scenario
3)
Scenario
#4: Infants Born to Mothers Who Have Received No Antiretroviral
Therapy During Pregnancy or Intrapartum
Recommendation
The 6-week neonatal ZDV component of the ZDV chemoprophylactic regimen
should be discussed with the mother and offered for the newborn.
ZDV should be initiated as soon as possible after delivery - preferably
within 6-12 hours of birth.
Some clinicians may choose to use ZDV in combination with other
antiretroviral drugs, particularly if the mother is known or suspected
to have ZDV-resistant virus. However, the efficacy of this approach
for prevention of transmission is unknown, and appropriate dosing
regimens for neonates are incompletely defined. In the immediate
postpartum period, the woman should undergo appropriate assessments
(e.g., CD4+ count and HIV-1 RNA copy number) to determine if antiretroviral
therapy is required for her own health. The infant should undergo
early diagnostic testing so that if HIV-infected, treatment can
be initiated as soon as possible.
Discussion
Definitive data are not available to address whether ZDV administered
solely during the neonatal period would reduce the risk for perinatal
transmission. Epidemiologic data from a New York State study suggest
a decline in transmission when infants were given zidovudine for
the first 6 weeks of life compared to no prophylaxis (62, 63).
Transmission rates were 9% (95% CI, 4.1%-17.5%) for newborn only
ZDV prophylaxis (initiated within 48 hours after birth) compared
to 18% (95% CI, 7.7%-34.3%) when initiated after 48 hours and 27%
(95% CI 21%-33%) with no ZDV prophylaxis (62). Epidemiologic
data from North Carolina did not demonstrate a benefit of newborn
only ZDV compared to no prophylaxis (6). Transmission rates
were 27% (95%CI 8-55%) for newborn only prophylaxis and 31% (95%CI
24-39%) for no prophylaxis; the timing of infant prophylaxis initiation
was not defined in this study. Data from a case-control study of
postexposure prophylaxis of health-care workers who had nosocomial
percutaneous exposure to blood from HIV-1 infected persons indicate
that ZDV administration was associated with a 79% reduction in the
risk for HIV-1 seroconversion following exposure (64). Postexposure
prophylaxis also has prevented retroviral infection in some studies
involving animals (123-125).
The interval for which benefit may be gained from postexposure
prophylaxis is undefined. When prophylaxis was delayed beyond 48
hours after birth in the New York State study, no efficacy could
be demonstrated. Most infants initiated prophylaxis within 24 hours
in this study (63). Data from studies of animals indicate
that the longer the delay in institution of prophylaxis, the less
likely that prevention will be observed. In most studies of animals,
antiretroviral prophylaxis initiated 24-36 hours after exposure
usually is not effective for preventing infection, although later
administration has been associated with decreased viremia (119-121).
In cats, ZDV treatment initiated within the first 4 days after challenge
with feline leukemia virus afforded protection, whereas treatment
initiated 1 week postexposure did not prevent infection (122).
The relevance of these animal studies to prevention of perinatal
HIV transmission in humans is unknown. HIV-1 infection is established
in most infected infants by age 1 to 2 weeks. Of 271 infected infants,
HIV-1 DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 38% of
infected infants tested within 48 hours of birth. No substantial
change in diagnostic sensitivity was observed within the first week
of life, but detection rose rapidly during the second week of life,
reaching 93% by age 14 days (123). Initiation of postexposure
prophylaxis after the age of 2 days is not likely to be efficacious
in preventing transmission, and by 14 days of age infection would
already be established in most infants.
When neither the antenatal nor intrapartum parts of the three-part
ZDV regimen are received by the mother, administration of antiretroviral
drugs to the newborn provides chemoprophylaxis only after HIV-1
exposure has already occurred. Some clinicians view this situation
as analogous to nosocomial postexposure prophylaxis and may wish
to provide ZDV in combination with one or more other antiretroviral
agents. Such a decision must be accompanied by a discussion with
the woman of the potential benefits and risks of this approach and
the lack of data to address its efficacy and safety.
See Table 3: Clinical Scenarios and
Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Reduce Periantal
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission

|

|