
|
Randomized,
Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Caspofungin versus Amphotericin
B for Treatment of Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Candidiasis
[Arathoon EG et al. AAC 2002;46:451] The
authors present a phase two, dose-ranging study in which AIDS patients
with thrush or Candida esophagitis were randomized to receive
one of three daily doses of caspofungin (35, 50 or 70 mg) or amphotericin
B (0.5 mg/kg) IV once daily for 7-14 days. The results showed a
trend toward superior clinical response and clearance of C. albicans
in the caspofungin group, although the differences were not statistically
significant. As expected, adverse reactions, especially infusion
related adverse reactions, were far greater in the recipients of
amphotericin B.
Esophageal
and Oropharyngeal Candidiasis:
Caspofungin vs. Amphotericin B |
|
|
Caspofungin
n = 103*
|
Ampho
B
n = 35
|
|
Clinical
response
|
86
(83%)
|
22
(62%)
|
|
C. albicans cleared
|
75%
|
55%
|
|
Infusion
related ADR
|
<1%
|
69%
|
| *Data
for recipients of 35 mg, 50 mg or 70 mg are pooled |
Comment: There
are sparse data regarding caspofungin for candidiasis, but the results
here show that it appears to be as good as amphotericin and certainly
less toxic. For the condition treated, most physicians would use an
azole by mouth for outpatients. It is unfortunate that this was not
included as an additional arm of the study or that the entry criteria
were not restricted to those who failed this more conventional and
far less difficult IV treatment. Nevertheless, it is good to have
these data regarding caspofungin for infections involving Candida
species.
posted 2/08/2002

|

|