
|
Long-Term
Clinical Outcome of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients
with Discordant Immunologic and Virologic Responses to a Protease
Inhibitor-Containing Regimen [Piketty C, et al. JID
2001;183:1328]: This
is a report from Paris concerning a cohort of 150 HIV-infected patients
who began a PI-based HAART regimen in 1996. Results were analyzed
based on virologic response and CD4 cell count response. The former
was defined as a decrease in HIV RNA level by 1 log or greater,
and the CD4 cell response was defined as an increase at 12 months
from the baseline of <100/mm3.
Using this definition, 90 patients responded by both parameters,
and 18 were negative/negative. There were 42 with discordant responses,
including 28 with increases in CD4 cell count/negative virologic
response and 14 with immunologic failure plus virologic response.
Outcome was evaluated by the frequency of AIDS-defining events or
death during an average of 30 months of observation and correlated
with the four outcomes defined above at 12 months. The results are
shown in the table below:
| Outcome
at 12 mos. |
No.
|
Events
at 30 months |
| CD4
,
VL *
|
90 |
2%
|
| CD4
,
VL
|
28 |
14% |
| CD4
,
VL
|
14 |
21% |
| CD4
,
VL |
18 |
67% |
* CD4
= increase from baseline of <100/mm3
VL
= decrease by 10 x or to <500 c/mL |
The
authors conclude that the CD4 cell response is more important than
viral load in predicting clinical outcome.
Comment: This
is an interesting report, but it's hard to know what to do with
the data. It is not surprising that the CD4 cell count response
was more important than viral load in determining prognosis according
to clinical events. Guidelines are based primarily on viral load
responses and changes are recommended based on suboptimal virologic
response. Unfortunately, there are few or no data to indicate that
changes in HAART regimens will deal effectively with discordant
responses when the CD4 cell count fails to increase.
posted 5/16/2001

|

|